Property Dispute Escalates to Criminal Harassment
A southwest London neighbor has been found guilty of harassment following a prolonged campaign against a couple’s property redevelopment plans. Robin Christie, 65, repeatedly obstructed construction access to Samuel Tempest Brooks and Julia Stafford’s Edwardian-era residence in the Hampton Village conservation area.
Conservation Area Conflict
The dispute began when the couple purchased the former waterworks property for £850,000 and secured planning permission for a subterranean development with a two-story extension. Christie and fellow Hill House Drive residents objected to proposed demolition of a boundary wall that would create gated access through their cul-de-sac.
Court evidence revealed Christie padlocked his bicycle to a makeshift gate blocking vehicle entry and engaged in multiple physical confrontations regarding perimeter fencing placement. Video documentation showed heated exchanges where Stafford shouted “Get off my land” during one altercation.
Courtroom Revelations
Wimbledon Magistrates’ Court heard how tensions peaked in July 2024 when Stafford attempted to erect security fencing. “Christie was inciting hostility and falsely claiming ownership rights,” Stafford testified, describing physical injuries sustained during fence-related altercations. Medical documentation showed bruising consistent with her account.
Deputy District Judge Patricia Evans characterized Christie’s behavior as “arrogant and intimidating,” particularly noting his unauthorized entry onto the couple’s property. Evidence also included a controversial letter Christie sent to Brooks’ law firm suggesting professional misconduct, which the judge deemed inflammatory rather than conciliatory.
Community Fallout
The conflict ultimately halted development plans, with the boundary wall demolition rejected last June. The property recently returned to market at £999,950 without completed renovations. Residents previously mobilized vehicles to block construction equipment access when demolition crews arrived.
Christie, who described himself as the residents’ “calmest spokesperson,” maintained his actions protected community interests. However, the court found his persistent surveillance and obstruction tactics constituted harassment. Sentencing awaits probation reports for the first-time offender.
Stafford described developing PTSD symptoms and family disruption: “My children witnessed attacks and threats – we couldn’t feel safe in our own home.” The judge noted Christie “lost perspective” while championing neighborhood opposition to the renovation project.