The US Patent and Trademark Workplace has rejected Neuralink’s try and trademark the product names Telepathy and Telekinesis, citing pending functions by one other particular person for a similar emblems.
Neuralink, the mind implant firm cofounded by Elon Musk, filed to trademark the names in March. However in letters despatched to Neuralink in August, the trademark workplace is refusing to permit the functions to maneuver ahead. It says Wesley Berry, a pc scientist and a cofounder of the tech startup Prophetic, beforehand filed trademark functions for Telepathy in Might 2023 and Telekinesis in August 2024. Prophetic is constructing a wearable headset to induce lucid dreaming, however solely Berry is the creator of the trademark functions, not Prophetic. (Berry declined to remark for this story.)
In response to Neuralink’s software for Telepathy, the trademark workplace additionally references the present trademark for Telepathy Labs, a Tampa-based firm that gives interactive voice and chatbot expertise to companies.
Musk’s Neuralink, in the meantime, is growing a brain-computer interface that includes a tool, surgically implanted within the cranium, that collects mind exercise. The corporate has been utilizing the identify Telepathy to explain its first product, which is designed to permit paralyzed folks the power to function their telephones and computer systems with simply their ideas. Musk unveiled the Telepathy identify in a January 2024 social media put up, shortly after the corporate implanted its first volunteer with the expertise. A complete of 9 folks now have the Neuralink system, in line with a July announcement. (Neuralink didn’t reply to a request for remark.)
Each Berry and Neuralink filed “intent-to-use” functions, which permit companies and inventors to order trademark rights earlier than utilizing the mark in commerce. Berry’s software for Telepathy was accepted in December 2024 and for Telekinesis in August 2025 however the emblems aren’t totally registered till he reveals that he’s truly utilizing them in commerce. Berry has three years to try this from acceptance, in any other case his functions could be thought-about deserted and Neuralink’s software would take precedence.
Berry has not marketed nor commercialized a product referred to as Telepathy or Telekinesis, however in his trademark functions describes each as “software program that analyzes EEG to decode inner dialogue to manage pc or cellular gadgets.” EEG, or electroencephalogram, information refers back to the electrical exercise of the mind recorded by means of electrodes worn on the scalp.
The trademark workplace’s letters to Neuralink should not last selections. Neuralink filed a response letter on August 28 addressing the present Telepathy Labs trademark, saying that Neuralink’s Telepathy product shouldn’t be more likely to be confused with Telepathy Labs. Neuralink didn’t tackle Berry’s functions in its response.
“The usual for probability of confusion is, if a random client encountered each of those merchandise, would they assume that they’re coming from the identical firm?” says Heather Antoine, an mental property associate at Stoel Rives in Sacramento, California.
The trademark workplace will take into account Neuralink’s response and resolve if there’s a probability of confusion. However there’s nonetheless the truth that Berry filed to register the Telepathy and Telekinesis marks first. If Berry succeeds in registering the marks, Neuralink would have a number of choices. It might try to purchase the emblems from Berry or negotiate a consent settlement, through which Berry might agree to permit Neuralink to additionally use the marks. These kind of agreements are normally made when the emblems should not more likely to trigger client confusion.
If Berry is profitable in registering Telepathy, Neuralink may very well be sued if the corporate continues to make use of it.
Josh Gerben, a trademark legal professional and founding father of Gerben IP in Washington, DC, says it’s tough to understand how issues will shake out as a result of there’s quite a lot of nuance to a trademark declare. “Actually for the time being, although, benefit goes to this different applicant,” he says, referring to Berry. “He might change into a substantial thorn within the aspect of Neuralink by way of these emblems.”
