Veteran diplomat on Trump’s aims together with his World Financial Discussion board speech : NPR

LEILA FADEL, HOST:

OK, we’ll dig additional into President Trump’s rambling speech at Davos at present. As we heard, it went on for greater than an hour as he veered from portray a very rosy image of the U.S. financial system that does not appear to match actuality to calling European allies ungrateful, to creating racist remarks about Somalis being low-IQ individuals and pirates. To unpack Trump’s remarks that lasted all this time and what this speech means for the U.S.-led world order, Richard Haass joins me now. He was a outstanding American diplomat and the president emeritus of the Council on Overseas Relations. Good morning, and welcome again to this system.

RICHARD HAASS: Good morning, and good to be again.

FADEL: So I wish to begin with what U.S. allies in Europe had been listening for, Trump’s place on Greenland and whether or not it is comfortable. And as we heard from our correspondent, Trump did say he would not use power, however he demanded quick negotiations with Denmark for the U.S. to accumulate Greenland. Let’s hear somewhat little bit of what else he stated.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: So we would like a bit of ice for world safety, they usually will not give it. We have by no means requested for the rest, and we might have saved that piece of land, and we did not. In order that they have a selection. You’ll be able to say sure, and we can be very appreciative, or you’ll be able to say no, and we are going to keep in mind.

FADEL: I imply, how will this message land with European allies, with Denmark and with Greenland?

HAASS: Let me provide you with two solutions. By way of Greenland, individuals can be relieved over the ruling out of army power. They will be uneasy ‘trigger it is nonetheless not clear what america requires and whether or not Trump is ready to just accept one thing wanting what he calls possession. And if he does not get it, what could be his retaliation? What could be the results for Ukraine or for Europe? In order that’s one set of questions.

So perhaps there is a shallow sigh of aid, however not a deep one. And the opposite response is solely certainly one of – in some methods, it goes again to the Canadian prime minister’s discuss yesterday of actual unease. They see this American president. They hear him, his views his disparaging views of NATO, of particular person European leaders, his tackle historical past. I’d assume the typical European says, that is an untenable state of affairs. We not have a United States we are able to belief or companion with. We’d like to consider the subsequent period of historical past ‘trigger the earlier one has come to a detailed.

FADEL: So you do not see anyone being reassured about U.S. management, given this speech?

HAASS: On the contrary. There is a narrowness about U.S. overseas coverage by way of business achieve. There’s – we have moved from working by means of consent to coercion. We see our allies not as companions, however, in lots of circumstances, as quasi-adversaries wanted to be pushed. You realize, when you keep in mind, additionally, the nationwide safety technique, the best way Europe was handled, virtually a contempt for European tradition. You heard a few of that at present, the insulting feedback about a number of leaders. So no, this was not a – this won’t be taken by anybody in Europe as a pleasant deal with.

FADEL: And as you identified, as our correspondent identified, the prime minister of Canada, Mark Carney, received quite a lot of consideration yesterday for mainly saying the outdated U.S.-led world order was a pleasing fiction that not serves its allies, and center powers like Canada must get – to unite in opposition to this bullying, nice energy, bullying nice energy. He known as this second a rupture and never a transition. After which we heard Trump instantly reply with what appeared like a menace. And we heard it earlier, however I am simply going to cite him right here once more. Canada lives due to america. Do not forget that, Mark, the subsequent time you make your statements. What did you make of that?

HAASS: That was crude. I do not know another phrase for it. It was crude. It was heavy-handed. That sounded extra like a mob boss than just like the president of america. It was a veiled warning. Nothing was express. And I do not know what it’d imply by way of tariffs or different pressures. However that was – once more, that’s not the language you utilize to a neighbor and an ally. Keep in mind, one of many nice structural benefits of america is we now have this companion on our northern border. We do not have to place troops up in opposition to Canada. We are able to loosen up. Most different international locations have to fret about harmful neighbors. We do not. And the president appears to be going out of his method to alter this relationship for the more serious.

FADEL: A number of instances, we heard Trump say a model of this.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

TRUMP: The USA is the financial engine on the planet. And when America booms, the whole world booms. It has been the historical past.

FADEL: And he mainly was saying, gee, you simply must comply with what the U.S. is doing. If we do nice, you may do nice. Do what we are saying. And he was chatting with European allies who had made it clear they had been on edge over whether or not this alliance was now turning into an adversarial relationship over NATO, over Greenland. Will they stroll away reassured in any respect?

HAASS: Look, on the financial, the president have some extent. Properly, when the U.S. does effectively, the remainder of the world advantages. Once we sneeze, the remainder of the world catches a chilly. So I believe that is a truth of life, however they are not going to be reassured. Give it some thought. The assaults on the independence of the Federal Reserve Board, america is operating near a $39 trillion deficit, questions on American steadiness and reliability. So the truth that america is so necessary to their financial and strategic futures, but this isn’t a United States they acknowledge anymore. So no, they do not come away reassured. Although they do nonetheless admire, I believe it is honest to level out, the fact in our potential for financial innovation and progress.

FADEL: If the outdated order is useless, what’s the new order, in your view, and the place does that go away america?

HAASS: Properly, that is the stuff of historical past. And that is – you understand, it’ll be messier. It’ll be most likely extra battle, much less affluent, much less free, much less American affect. However the particulars are to be decided. And that is why, you understand, historical past by no means ends. You will have pauses. You will have transitions. And my sense is we’re approaching a transition. However I nonetheless assume to be decided is what is the character, each of the place we get to and the way we get there. And that is nonetheless a giant difficulty for this administration and, conceivably, for the subsequent one.

FADEL: And as you listened at present to this speech, what was your one massive takeaway from at present and what which may imply for the longer term?

HAASS: How little this administration and this president respect what they inherited and the way little they worth the final eight many years. They usually appear so keen to calmly, virtually recklessly, throw it away for one thing that is unknown and virtually sure to be far worse. And it is the sense of recklessness and virtually irresponsibility. They’re stewards and custodians of the welfare of this nation. And I come away uneasy after which some – that is a diplomatic understatement – with how they’re treating the inheritance and the way sanguine they appear to be that we are able to transfer to one thing totally different that they’re persuaded can be higher.

FADEL: Veteran diplomat Richard Haass is president emeritus of the Council on Overseas Relations. Thanks in your time.

HAASS: Thanks.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

Copyright © 2026 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.

Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts could differ. Transcript textual content could also be revised to right errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or publication. The authoritative file of NPR’s programming is the audio file.