That ‘low cost’ open-source AI mannequin is definitely burning by means of your compute funds

Metro Loud
10 Min Read

Need smarter insights in your inbox? Join our weekly newsletters to get solely what issues to enterprise AI, knowledge, and safety leaders. Subscribe Now


A complete new research has revealed that open-source synthetic intelligence fashions devour considerably extra computing sources than their closed-source rivals when performing similar duties, probably undermining their value benefits and reshaping how enterprises consider AI deployment methods.

The analysis, performed by AI agency Nous Analysis, discovered that open-weight fashions use between 1.5 to 4 instances extra tokens — the essential models of AI computation — than closed fashions like these from OpenAI and Anthropic. For easy data questions, the hole widened dramatically, with some open fashions utilizing as much as 10 instances extra tokens.

“Open weight fashions use 1.5–4× extra tokens than closed ones (as much as 10× for easy data questions), making them generally costlier per question regardless of decrease per‑token prices,” the researchers wrote of their report revealed Wednesday.

The findings problem a prevailing assumption within the AI business that open-source fashions supply clear financial benefits over proprietary alternate options. Whereas open-source fashions usually value much less per token to run, the research suggests this benefit could be “simply offset in the event that they require extra tokens to cause a few given downside.”


AI Scaling Hits Its Limits

Energy caps, rising token prices, and inference delays are reshaping enterprise AI. Be part of our unique salon to find how prime groups are:

  • Turning power right into a strategic benefit
  • Architecting environment friendly inference for actual throughput features
  • Unlocking aggressive ROI with sustainable AI methods

Safe your spot to remain forward: https://bit.ly/4mwGngO


The actual value of AI: Why ‘cheaper’ fashions could break your funds

The analysis examined 19 totally different AI fashions throughout three classes of duties: fundamental data questions, mathematical issues, and logic puzzles. The staff measured “token effectivity” — what number of computational models fashions use relative to the complexity of their options—a metric that has obtained little systematic research regardless of its vital value implications.

“Token effectivity is a crucial metric for a number of sensible causes,” the researchers famous. “Whereas internet hosting open weight fashions could also be cheaper, this value benefit could possibly be simply offset in the event that they require extra tokens to cause a few given downside.”

Open-source AI fashions use as much as 12 instances extra computational sources than essentially the most environment friendly closed fashions for fundamental data questions. (Credit score: Nous Analysis)

The inefficiency is especially pronounced for Giant Reasoning Fashions (LRMs), which use prolonged “chains of thought” to resolve advanced issues. These fashions, designed to suppose by means of issues step-by-step, can devour hundreds of tokens pondering easy questions that ought to require minimal computation.

For fundamental data questions like “What’s the capital of Australia?” the research discovered that reasoning fashions spend “a whole lot of tokens pondering easy data questions” that could possibly be answered in a single phrase.

Which AI fashions truly ship bang on your buck

The analysis revealed stark variations between mannequin suppliers. OpenAI’s fashions, significantly its o4-mini and newly launched open-source gpt-oss variants, demonstrated distinctive token effectivity, particularly for mathematical issues. The research discovered OpenAI fashions “stand out for excessive token effectivity in math issues,” utilizing as much as 3 times fewer tokens than different industrial fashions.

Amongst open-source choices, Nvidia’s llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1 emerged as “essentially the most token environment friendly open weight mannequin throughout all domains,” whereas newer fashions from firms like Magistral confirmed “exceptionally excessive token utilization” as outliers.

The effectivity hole various considerably by process kind. Whereas open fashions used roughly twice as many tokens for mathematical and logic issues, the distinction ballooned for easy data questions the place environment friendly reasoning ought to be pointless.

OpenAI’s newest fashions obtain the bottom prices for easy questions, whereas some open-source alternate options can value considerably extra regardless of decrease per-token pricing. (Credit score: Nous Analysis)

What enterprise leaders must learn about AI computing prices

The findings have instant implications for enterprise AI adoption, the place computing prices can scale quickly with utilization. Corporations evaluating AI fashions typically deal with accuracy benchmarks and per-token pricing, however could overlook the overall computational necessities for real-world duties.

“The higher token effectivity of closed weight fashions typically compensates for the upper API pricing of these fashions,” the researchers discovered when analyzing whole inference prices.

The research additionally revealed that closed-source mannequin suppliers seem like actively optimizing for effectivity. “Closed weight fashions have been iteratively optimized to make use of fewer tokens to cut back inference value,” whereas open-source fashions have “elevated their token utilization for newer variations, presumably reflecting a precedence towards higher reasoning efficiency.”

The computational overhead varies dramatically between AI suppliers, with some fashions utilizing over 1,000 tokens for inner reasoning on easy duties. (Credit score: Nous Analysis)

How researchers cracked the code on AI effectivity measurement

The analysis staff confronted distinctive challenges in measuring effectivity throughout totally different mannequin architectures. Many closed-source fashions don’t reveal their uncooked reasoning processes, as a substitute offering compressed summaries of their inner computations to stop rivals from copying their methods.

To handle this, researchers used completion tokens — the overall computational models billed for every question — as a proxy for reasoning effort. They found that “most up-to-date closed supply fashions won’t share their uncooked reasoning traces” and as a substitute “use smaller language fashions to transcribe the chain of thought into summaries or compressed representations.”

The research’s methodology included testing with modified variations of well-known issues to attenuate the affect of memorized options, resembling altering variables in mathematical competitors issues from the American Invitational Arithmetic Examination (AIME).

Totally different AI fashions present various relationships between computation and output, with some suppliers compressing reasoning traces whereas others present full particulars. (Credit score: Nous Analysis)

The way forward for AI effectivity: What’s coming subsequent

The researchers counsel that token effectivity ought to change into a major optimization goal alongside accuracy for future mannequin improvement. “A extra densified CoT can even permit for extra environment friendly context utilization and should counter context degradation throughout difficult reasoning duties,” they wrote.

The discharge of OpenAI’s open-source gpt-oss fashions, which exhibit state-of-the-art effectivity with “freely accessible CoT,” may function a reference level for optimizing different open-source fashions.

The entire analysis dataset and analysis code are obtainable on GitHub, permitting different researchers to validate and lengthen the findings. Because the AI business races towards extra highly effective reasoning capabilities, this research means that the true competitors is probably not about who can construct the neatest AI — however who can construct essentially the most environment friendly one.

In any case, in a world the place each token counts, essentially the most wasteful fashions could discover themselves priced out of the market, no matter how nicely they will suppose.


Share This Article