Again within the 2010s, an internet site known as Let Me Google That For You gained a notable quantity of recognition for serving a single function: snark.
The positioning enables you to generate a customized hyperlink which you could ship any person who asks you a query. Once they click on the hyperlink, it performs an animation of the method of typing a query into Google. The thought is to point out the particular person asking the query how straightforward it will have been for them to simply search for the reply themselves.
It is an insult, principally. It is humorous and impolite.
Now, there’s nothing fallacious with a bit rudeness in the correct context. If an overtly hostile particular person is losing your time on social media by asking simply researched questions, I feel it’s best to go forward and revel in a bit passive aggression (as a deal with).
In additional private contexts, although, utilizing Let Me Google That For You states clearly that you do not respect the particular person you gave the hyperlink to, and that their query is a waste of your time. If somebody out of your office or your private life is asking you a query, it is as a result of they need your particular enter, so it is higher to simply give the reply—ideally with context solely you’ll be able to present—than it’s to ship a hyperlink to a Google search outcomes web page.
Now, this being 2025, the folks behind Let Me Google That For You additionally supply Let Me ChatGPT That For You, which works precisely the best way you suppose it does. And its existence factors to one thing new: how impolite it’s to, in response to a query, reply with AI output—particularly in a extra skilled context.
Losing Time
Telling somebody to Google one thing will be humorous and satisfying, nevertheless it’s not useful. I might put copy-pasting or screenshotting a dialog with ChatGPT, Claude, or another AI agent in the identical class: not useful and sort of impolite.
Developer Alex Martsinovich touched on this some time in the past in a weblog put up known as it is impolite to point out AI output to folks: “Be well mannered, and do not ship people AI textual content,” he writes. “My very own tackle AI etiquette is that AI output can solely be relayed if it is both adopted as your personal or there may be specific consent from the receiving get together.” I feel this can be a fairly good framework for AI etiquette.
If somebody asks you a query, after they may have requested the machine as an alternative, it is as a result of they needed your perspective. The web exists, not less than in idea, in order that people can join with one another, and in order that we will profit from one another’s information. Responding to a query with AI output ignores this dynamic, particularly if you happen to do not say that is what you are doing.